hard-copy reading vs. on-line reading

In the book "Gown Up Digital" I read where a study was conducted about increase in student learning and reading test scores in particular. For the first time I was introduced to there being a regular "hard-copy" text reading, like from a book or magazine and an "on-line" reading distinction. My concern is having students be able to do well in both. Is one better than the other? Can one succeed if one’s can only do one well? In my blog I was referring to student’s struggling with having regular book reading difficulties, but seeming to be focused when on the computer seeming to be engaged. Eventually they are going to have to read more in depth things assigned to them which they can perhaps readily locate on the internet by just having to read web-links, headlines, captions to get there. Once there what will they do, is my concern.

No Fear

I have seen some kids who don't know where to begin in the classroom when it comes down to something as simple as just copying stuff off the blackboard come to life when they have the chance to click around and scroll up and down when on the computer. Is it because it is perceived as just a new gadget, a new toy for them to play with? Well whatever it may be, I guess that if it gets the job done, than so be it. Like the way sports are supposed to be played, it's not who wins or loses, but how the game is played that matters. Perhaps this new medium will entice kids to want to read, as so much reading is required on a screen. Inquisitiveness could lead to frustration if mindlessly clicking around leads to nowhere.